Word for the Day
Every once in awhile I will put my name into Google™ to see what turns up. Occasionally I wll be surprised to find someone has said something nice about me. Last month, for example, a blogger lilked one of my poems so much, he decided to reprint it on his blog. (At least he credited me, and linked back to my site, for which I am grateful.)
And in discovering this reprint I learned a new word. As my grade school teachers taught me, if I can use it in a sentence, the word is mine. So:
The word, “arachibutyrophilic,”
sticks to the roof of your mouth
like a teaspoonful of peanut butter
scooped straight from the jar.
Real Hobbits
Skeletal remains of a “hobbit” found in Indonesia. Scientists speculate some of the descendents could be alive today.
And now for Lewis Carroll…
`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
“Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!”
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought –
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
And, as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!
One, two! One, two! And through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.
“And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!’
He chortled in his joy.
`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
Source: Lewis Carroll – Jabberwocky
Lets see how Joyce scores on readability…
Now (to forebare for ever solittle of Iris Trees and Lili O’Rangans), concerning the genesis of Harold or Humphrey Chimpden’s occupational agnomen (we are back in the presurnames prodromarith period, of course just when enos chalked halltraps) and discarding once for all those theories from older sources which would link him back with such pivotal ancestors as the Glues, the Gravys, the Northeasts, the Ankers and the Earwickers of Sidlesham in the Hundred of Manhood or proclaim him offsprout of vikings who had founded wapentake and seddled hem in Herrick or Eric, the best authenticated version, the Dumlat, read the Reading of Hofed-ben-Edar, has it that it was this way. We are told how in the beginning it came to pass that like cabbaging Cincinnatus the grand old gardener was saving daylight under his redwoodtree one sultry sabbath afternoon, Hag Chivychas Eve, in prefall paradise peace by following his plough for rootles in the rere garden of mobhouse, ye olde marine hotel, when royalty was announced by runner to have been pleased to have halted itself on the highroad along which a leisureloving dogfox had cast followed, also at walking pace, by a lady pack of cocker spaniels.
Source: James Joyce, “Finnegan’s Wake”
Stats added to each entry
Look kids! Wow!
Can you see the numbers?
Word Statistics
I just added a plugin to my blog — called MTWordStats
As I am writing this entry, the stats are as follows:
392860 – Characters
104364 – Syllables
8965 – Unique words
66033 – Words
3596 – Occurances of “the”
3970 – Sentences
2439 – Paragraphs
16.6329974811083 – Average words per sentence
1.58048248602971 – Average syllables per word
12.0517118572231 – “Fog” readability index
56.2436892385614 – “Flesch” readability index
9.54656235278285 – “Kincaid” readability index
Of course…as soon as I post this the stats will change.
Both the Fog readability and Kincaid readability indexes measure readability by grade level. As you can see, there is a slight disagreement in results. But those without a high school education are likely to find reading this blog difficult. I am not surprised by this. The flesch readability index measures on a scale of 1-100 with the higher number meaning the easier to read. One source I read says standard documents aim between 60-70. So this is slightly more difficult to read than standard documents. Fine.
I can measure the number of occurances for any word. If anyone would like to know how often I say a particular word, feel free to make suggestions in the comments.
Go Packers! (or maybe not…)
For the past 15 elections (since 1936), if the Washington Redskins lost their last home game before the election…the incumbent party lost the election.
If the Redskins won, the incumbent party won.
Of course…the Boston Red Sox just won the World Series…
So I’m not sure if this means I should root for the Packers or not…
Cats are Democrats
Can’t say I am 100% in favor of the characterization of Cats, Dogs, or Democrats…but there is some humor to it.